Tags
The Investor's PodcastStig BrodersenTobias CarlisleWesley GrayJake Taylor
Link
Date Consumed
September 27, 2021
Action
Count (Month)
30
Created
Sep 27, 2021 9:31 PM
Last Edited
Nov 10, 2021 7:12 PM
TL;DR
- Investing is 99% behavior and 1% selection
- The ideal portfolio (as Dalio would suggest) is 10-20 uncorrelated assets
- But, this kind of diversification comes with costs
- Some will work, others won't...expected volatility is modest but so are expected returns
- Leverage increases returns and increases risk of total loss
- Concentration can increase and will increase volatility
- Main benefit of concentration is enabling one to stay within their circle of competence and thus best control their behavior
- Seeking to take volatility out of concentration comes with added costs and execution risk
- Simple trend following (e.g. 200 day MA) will take one out of market during major drawdowns but will also miss "bounces". Can avoid major (e.g. 50%+) drawdowns, but also creates performance drag in non-downtrend markets (e.g. impossible to know when market has truly entered a downturn, therefore will get whipsawed at expenses of uptrend performance).
- Complex trend following (e.g. managed futures) require a large allocation (e.g. 20-50%) to keep portfolio neutral when market drops...but have minimal expected return therefore drag on long-term portfolio performance.
- Tail risk funds will consistently "blow up" (as designed)...dragging on returns unless/until they hit the very rare big payday, which might / might not compensate for aggregate losses.
- Keeping e.g. 5 years of cash also a drag on performance, measured by inflation and opportunity cost.
- This is all another way of saying: there's no such thing as a free lunch
- Alignment of behavior to investing style and strategy is the key factor
- If hedging or trend following, this includes having a plan for if/when hedges pay out (typically, doubling down on positions that are down with the market), otherwise fail to realize the benefits of the strategies